Tuesday, May 26, 2015

The Matthew Effect

Below is the extended version of my ASCD InService post: http://inservice.ascd.org/the-matthew-effect/


Earlier this month, I had the privilege of attending the Core Advocates convening in Denver, Colorado. The experience, facilitated by Student Achievement Partners, offered participants not only a forum to share and collaborate with educators from across the nation, but also an opportunity to learn from lead writers and contributors of the Common Core State Standards. The sessions throughout the conference afforded an in-depth look at the Standards, the Shifts, and how America’s schools can best serve, challenge, and prepare her students.

As I reflect on my experience and the incredibly informative sessions I attended, I continue to be profoundly struck by the notion of the Matthew Effect and what I believe is America’s missed opportunity to close the achievement gap. Though I had investigated the Matthew Effect in the past, listening to the data presented by David Liben and Silas Kulkarni was so staggering it reignited my passion to help solve this crisis for kids.

So what is the Matthew Effect and what does the research say? The term Matthew Effect refers to the notion that “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.” Essentially, research has identified (and any teacher can attest to it) that some children enter school “wealthier” than their classmates when it comes to literacy foundational skills. As students move forward, those children who start out with advantages, in terms of early reading skills and vocabulary, tend to thrive and grow academically, while those “less wealthy” students tend to languish.

With alarming studies like the 30 Million Word Gap reiterating the catastrophic long term effects on students that do not possess these foundational skills, it is incumbent on our country to stem the tide. Consider this graphic below that illustrates this point:


And that data just represents the first three years of a child’s life. Now compound this divide over the next three, six, nine, or twelve years (when the children would be sophomores in high school). Research is clear: knowledge of words is knowledge of the world. So how can we, as a collective, curve some of the Matthew Effect and level the playing field. Below are a few ideas with which to start the conversation:

1) Early intervention is crucial. High quality preschool is absolutely essential. All children deserve the opportunity to start their school career on grade level - or at least relatively close - instead of several years behind as they take their first steps into kindergarten.

Additionally, we must advocate and instill programs that intervene in the primary grades to bridge gaps and support student development. All too often I see intervention programs attempting to mend disconnects children face in grades 3, 4, and 5. It’s disingenuous. Generally speaking, intervention in grades 4 and 5 is about targeted skill instruction to help pass a test. But if we don’t begin intervention programs until students hit the intermediate grades in elementary school - we’ve missed our opportunity. Our programs should focus on students in K-3. Identify gaps and provide remediation early! Without this intervention, the gap widens over time until by 4th grade it is almost insurmountable. Research dictates that in 5th grade and above, literacy intervention programs are only successful with about 13% of struggling readers.

And it makes sense because there’s a dynamic shift that occurs in 4th grade. From birth until grade 3, children learn to read. Oral language, phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, etc… But from 4th grade on, we read to learn. And when students are disfluent and lack depth when it comes to vocabulary, it sets them on a path to underachievement for the rest of their school careers. Negative sense of school and self are amplified, dropout rates increase, and therefore graduation rates decrease. It’s an absolute stark issue that we must stop ignoring.

2) The research is clear: students must be exposed to words early and often, as this is proven to increase vocabulary. So whether that’s via conversation or song or a read aloud, kids need to hear words all the time. How can we, as educators, support this? Here are a few ideas (not the end all be all, but a start):
  • Have opportunities for students to come early or stay late and let them listen to and be immersed in music. Let children hear the poetry in lyrics as a means of modeling fluency and increasing vocabulary. Music is multidimensional and magical. It connects to us auditorily and emotionally. Use music to expose children to language (and reap additional benefits of exposure to rhythm, tone, mood, and timing).
  • Create buddy situations with upper elementary students or even middle/high school students. The Matthew Effect is not simply an elementary school problem. It’s a system issue. Our children need a concerted effort from all levels and stakeholders. Buddy younger children up with older children and allow them time to talk; to ask questions; to engage in a conversation. With the advent of technology, this idea isn’t simply limited to face-to-face sessions. Give kids an opportunity to engage in a Google Hangout or Skype chat. Regardless of the medium, just give kids an opportunity to talk to develop oral language.
  • Host information day/evening sessions for parents and other stakeholders. Live stream them via Google Hangouts on Air - enable folks to attend virtually! The research I presented above is sobering. The more we can spread the word of the challenges students face, the stronger our potential to remedy it. Share strategies that parents and stakeholders can employ at home, in the car, or even at the park to help kids develop language.
  • Read aloud to children everyday. Experts recommend 15 minutes per day of a sustained read aloud. Reading aloud to children (of all ages) is vital to developing vocabulary and comprehension while modeling fluency.
  • Create initiatives in school around words that are meaningful. Reading a word, definition, and sentence over the PA during morning announcements doesn’t add value for children. Rather,
    • Put the word of the day on the bathroom or hall pass. And as children head to their destination, engage kids in a dialogue around the word.
    • Use Remind to send an alert to students and parents that contains the word of the day and then have the students use the chat feature to share an example of how they used the word in context outside of school! Further, to amplify this opportunity, don’t take weekends off! Send alerts on Saturdays and Sundays to keep the conversations going.
    • This idea may be a little unorthodox, but get your students and parents on Voxer! Allow them to engage in conversations around the word of the day through their device. This would provide students and parents not only an opportunity to connect to classmates beyond the school day, but yields valuable formative assessment data for teachers.
    • Finally, we need to rethink vocabulary instruction. Research suggests that “most words are learned by reading or being read to.” NOT by completing workbook pages. Vocabulary books that present 20 words per week are not simply devoid of context, they’re devoid of meaning for kids. By utilizing a Google extension like Read & Write For Google and providing some autonomy, students can create personalized vocabulary lists based on the texts that they are reading. This, of course, isn’t standardized...which is why it creates a more meaningful experience for students.  

The ideas above were meant to simply start a dialogue. The Matthew Effect is detrimental to our students’ future. And if one thing became abundantly clear to me this weekend, we cannot simply sit idly as the issue continues to manifest. We must all work together to help bridge this gap - not only for the sake of these children, but for the sake of our nation.

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Leap Of Faith


It isn’t a revolutionary idea; in fact, many schools have attempted and succeeded facilitating an unconference during a faculty meeting or perhaps even in-service. But for my district, it was the first of its kind.

During our scheduled April faculty meetings, our Department took a leap of faith and organized EdCamp Edison - an unconference opportunity for teachers in our district to share ideas, resources, and strategies. No pre-planned topics; no dictated agenda. Just the room for our elementary teachers to collaborate and grow.

As a connected educator, I am blessed to be surrounded by innovative thinkers and even better people. Leaning on my PLN to learn from their experience is invaluable. Their generosity - with both their resources and time - continues to astonish me. Specifically, I want to thank Kristen Swanson, the EdCamp Co-Founder (@KristenSwanson), Glenn Robbins, principal of Northfield Community School (@Glennr1809) and Jay Eitner, Superintendent of the Lower Alloways Creek School District (@iSuperEit) for their support. Consider the fact that a principal, superintendent, and the EdCamp co-founder took time out of their day to assist; not for recognition - but in the name of learning. Because in a PLN, titles are irrelevant. It’s about the greater good. We’re better together.

And so we, as a Department, coordinated the logistics and went for it. Stepped out on a ledge, created a Google Doc, and hoped sessions would generate. And they did… slowly at first, but they did! What was most encouraging wasn’t simply that folks were actually interested in leading a conversation...it was who volunteered. A good majority of teachers were non-tenured - even a few first years. It was truly inspiring to see so many teachers just starting their career share what they do in the classroom with educators from other buildings!

The feedback from our staff on the day was unbelievably positive. There were smiles on faces at 4:54pm during a Tuesday afternoon faculty meeting! Doesn’t get much better than that! If we, as a Department, expect to see a truly student-driven experience in the classroom, it is incumbent on us model a completely teacher-driven professional development opportunity. I believe people left EdCamp Edison empowered, invigorated, and renewed. A few dozen even left connected! You can read the Storify of our event HERE.  

One of the highlights of the experience that I was most excited about was that we were able to arrange for high school students to lead a session at each of the EdCamp locations. I’m very outspoken on the importance of infusing student voice into all our educational conversations, so to actually have the students share their experience was mind blowing. The poise and thoughtful way they articulated their perspectives on teaching and learning was incredibly powerful - for both our staff and the students themselves. In fact, at the conclusion of the event, one student shook my hand and said, “Thank you so much for having us. It was an amazing feeling that someone wanted to hear our voice and was listening.” Chills.

I’m proud to be part of a team that was willing to take a leap of faith with me during our first EdCamp faculty meeting. I’m proud to be part of a team that is beginning to turn the page on the past and instead look with focused eyes towards the future. But mostly I’m proud of our teachers and students - for stepping out of their comfort zone, sharing their story, and growing together.